Information Sharing GROUP TeleconferenceDate and Time | Attendees | Apologies | Agenda | Minutes | Next Regular Meeting | Next Standard Agreement Meeting
Date and Time
Attendees
Meeting has quorum. ApologiesAgenda
Minutes1. Attendance2. Prior Action Item Review
HOLDING:
3. New Business4. Literature ReviewWho is our audience? VRM Community? Enterprise? Internal to Kantara & ISOC? Thoughts from ISOC: Research would be unbiased and audience would be "us" i.e., those working on infosharing technologies. Not so much regulators. To give those of us working in this space a grounding of what's gone on before. (Which might change a bit if we want to reach out to a wider group.) Expectation that the initial research report not to come in with a pre-baked bias. Trent thinks we did that. We're ok. If we're going to reach out a wider audience, a bit of information sharing commentary/advocacy, as a "work group report" based on the research--as opposed to the research itself. In preparing the report, based on the research, there was definitely an effort to focus our attention on those items that illustrate the key theses of ISWG. Namely, an individual-centric perspective. "Based on a literature review funded by ISOC." Perhaps our audience is a wider group with a similar definition of "those working on information sharing technologies", extended to include folks who may not yet be a part of Kantara or ISOC, but who are building this emerging architecture. A secondary audience is regulators, who should understand what is happening in the technical context.
What change do we want to effect? Mark's intention was to build a foundation document. Given who we want to reach and how we want to effect them, that will drive cleaning up the logic flow and definitions. As an introduction to information sharing, we want to capture the motivation so people can understand why they should care. The essence of the report is that a bunch of smart people are working on a hard problem together; here's why and here's what we're trying to do about it. As a foundation document. ISWG as a change agent. Focusing on VPI as a distinct sharing activity. Why that's important. Change we want to effect:
We could be revolutionary, but we shouldn't. Rather we can paint how our work is an evolutionary advance. 5. Personal RFPWorking on narrative sequence from prose above (in Joe's MSWord doc). Reviewed document, Joe asked questions and added information as discussed. Mark to send work on 'standard in notice' (what's in the notice, where can it be found etc) to the group. Joe to integrate feedback on PRFP/ sharing data with manufacturer discussion. 6. Action Items Review
Next Regular Meeting16th August 2010 Next Standard Agreement MeetingTBA NOTE: Do not follow the code with a "#" symbol as it may cause the code not to be recognized. |
Bookmarks
Is this site useful to you? Please share it! On This Page:
Pages in this Space:
|
Weekly Meeting 2010 08 02 Minutes Pending
Labels:
None