[KI-LC] [BoT] Group "Join" Form
J. Trent Adams
adams at isoc.org
Tue Jun 30 08:18:13 PDT 2009
Joni -
What tasks do you believe a "Moderator" should be performing?
- Trent
Joni Brennan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to add a provision to section 5 stating that, in addition
> to the staff layer of management, ONE officer from each WG/DG will be
> designated as a list moderator. This could be the Chair, Vice-Chair
> or Secretary from each group.
>
> Or we could decided that one of those players will always = a list
> moderator. Perhaps Trent can weigh in on which WG/DG officer would be
> the best person to fill this role.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joni
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:34 AM, J. Trent Adams <adams at isoc.org
> <mailto:adams at isoc.org>> wrote:
>
> Roger M. -
>
> This appears to be a great clarification and streamlining of the
> process
> we were trying to define. I definitely appreciate the time and effort
> you put into carefully preserving the spirit of the prior work, while
> also improving it.
>
> My nits are so minor I feel embarrassed even bringing them up:
>
> 1. The term "Intellectual Property Rights" is
> introduced earlier than the acronym was
> parenthetically defined. Perhaps moving up the
> acronym to the first instance?
>
> 2. The term "Follower" is now only referenced in
> the second bullet of Section (6). Perhaps it makes
> sense to eliminate the term from the Definitions
> Section (2) and insert the meaning in (6)?
>
> 3. If we're leveraging defined terms (e.g. Member,
> Participant, etc.) from other Controlling
> Documents, do we need to formally reference
> them in some way? Perhaps by including them
> in the Definitions Section (2), linking a reference
> to the Bylaws and/or Operating Procedures as
> appropriate?
>
> 4. In the same vein, if we're referencing externally-
> defined terms, do we need to include the term
> "Participant of a Group" in this document? This
> seems close enough to "Participant" as defined
> in 1.13 of the Bylaws that perhaps we can remove
> the qualifying "of a Group" so they're equivalent?
> Or is there a subtle difference I'm missing?
>
> Let me know what you suggest.
>
> Thanks again,
> Trent
>
>
> Roger Martin wrote:
> > I have spent some time reviewing the "Groups Email Discussion List
> > Policy" draft and have rewritten it in what I believe to be an
> easier
> > to understand and more comprehensive format.
> >
> > I have attached my draft which is based on the following
> comments and
> > rationale:
> >
> > 1. The Policy needs to address both (1) Joining a Group as a
> > Participant and (2) Subscribing to a List as a Follower.
> In the
> > current draft these two concepts were intertwined and
> seemed to
> > be fairly confusing. I have attempted to split these two
> > concepts out into separate sections to the extent possible.
> >
> > 2. The introduction of the term "Contributor" is not needed since
> > "Participant", which is already defined in the Bylaws, is
> > sufficient. I have deleted usage of "Contributor". If we
> wish
> > to differentiate between Participants who do and do not
> actually
> > contribute postings to the Group List, then the term may be
> > useful, but personally I do not believe we should be
> encouraging
> > the concept of being a "passive" participant in a Group by not
> > contributing anything.
> >
> > 3. I propose that all Participants in a Group be automatically
> > Subscribed to the Group List. If a Member has additional
> > representatives who join a Group then they may need to
> > Subscribe, but in my opinion the roster of Participants in a
> > Group should automatically be included on the Group List.
> > Likewise for the BoT and LC lists, those holding a seat on
> > either body should be automatically subscribed to both Lists.
> >
> > I have made other changes to the text as I rearranged it, but I did
> > not intentionally change the meaning of the existing text except as
> > outlined above.
> >
> > I apologize that I do not have the document properly formatted,
> but I
> > have run out of time and will be in an offsite meeting all day
> > tomorrow. As noted in an earlier email, I do not have edit
> permission
> > on the online version of the document. I am including it as a
> PDF and
> > MSWORD file.
> >
> > I am sending it in its current state for consideration and
> discussion
> > as appropriate.
> >
> > ...rogerM
> >
> >
> >
> > Roger Martin wrote:
> >> Since I do not have "edit" privileges to the "Groups Email
> Discussion
> >> List Policy" and because I feel that these issues should be
> discussed
> >> by the entire list, I was going to posting my recommended changes
> >> (and rationale) to the LC and BoT lists in an email.
> >>
> >> However, after spending some time on rewriting the policy, I have
> >> decided to draft a new version.
> >>
> >> One of the primary difficulties is that while the title of this
> draft
> >> policy is "Groups Email Discussion List Policy", it actually also
> >> includes, and to some degree confuses, the policy about joining
> a WG
> >> or DG.
> >>
> >> As a result, I am going to propose restructuring it and renaming it
> >> to be "Policy for Joining Groups and Group Mailing Lists".
> >>
> >> I will post it for consideration as soon as I have completed the
> >> redrafting of the document.
> >>
> >> ....rogerM
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> /--
> >> ******************************************
> >> Roger Martin, Director of Standards
> >> AOL
> >> 22260 Pacific Blvd 41A:A03
> >> Dulles, VA 20166
> >> email: roger.martin at corp.aol.com <mailto:roger.martin at corp.aol.com>
> >> AIM: rjmartin99
> >> phone: 703-265-6203
> >> mobile: 703-389-1547
> >> *******************************************/
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LC mailing list
> > LC at kantarainitiative.org <mailto:LC at kantarainitiative.org>
> >
> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/lc_kantarainitiative.org
> >
>
> --
> J. Trent Adams
> =jtrentadams
>
> Outreach Specialist, Trust & Identity
> Internet Society
> http://www.isoc.org
>
> e) adams at isoc.org <mailto:adams at isoc.org>
> o) 703-439-2149
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Trustees mailing list
> Trustees at kantarainitiative.org <mailto:Trustees at kantarainitiative.org>
> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/trustees_kantarainitiative.org
>
>
>
>
> --
> Joni Brennan
> IEEE-ISTO
> Liberty Alliance Project
> Director of Operations
> voice:+1 732-226-4223
> email: joni @ projectliberty.org <http://projectliberty.org>
> email: joni @ ieee-isto.org <http://ieee-isto.org>
>
>
>
>
--
J. Trent Adams
=jtrentadams
Outreach Specialist, Trust & Identity
Internet Society
http://www.isoc.org
e) adams at isoc.org
o) 703-439-2149
More information about the LC
mailing list